Monday, February 21, 2011

Day 2: Canadian Chicken and Kenyan Egg!

Of late, a lot of web real-estate is devoted towards the injustice that is being perpetrated on the Associate nations. But with the way the three nations (well, BAN are only slightly better than CAN and KEN :-)) went about their game in the first three games of this world cup, we are most likely to be in for a very long and dreary month, where the winning margins are going to be bloated beyond imagination.

Probably Lorgat is right. But then how will the Associates improve if they don't play the game more often against stronger opposition? Now you know the reason for the title of this post :-))

Both Erasmus and Tucker (umpires of the NZL v KEN game) were reportedly paid only for half-a-day's work. By the way, it is not uncommon for umpires to wish (mind you, no influence; we are impartial!) the strong team to bowl first when they face a weaker team.  

As expected the BQ suffered Associatis.

B Part:

Rambo tried the Kenya stunt. But then, if Kenyans can fly...





Please send in your details for the next game asap.

Australia vs Zimbabwe by 16:25 hours SGT Monday

Can the Zimbabwean spinners cause a few flutters?

Q Part:

The second question was indeed tough. As Maddy said, I am unable to get in google. Tough to answer.

It is a matter of what you google for. Wifey said that I shall google for Kim Clijsters and Australian Open trophy images. Well she was in the right path, but could not find the answer - talk of women's impatience! The correct answer is the Australian women's singles trophy is named after Daphne Akhurst (the older picture is Daphne's and of course it was Kim Clijsters holding the trophy aloft! You can google now to get enlightened :-)).

Unfortunately, no one got the right answer. A number of people said that the ladies were Kim and Margaret Court and that they won the grand slams after becoming a mother and stuff like that. Tough luck this time around.

Now here is the next one.
Drumrolls pleazzzz...

An tricky bouncer from the world of numbers.

If the first "column" represents the number 427 then what does the second column represent?



Answers to the usual place.
Have a good week ahead.

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Day 1: Virut Sehli Prachunda Baloh!

So, finally the first ball was bowled and was promptly sent to the boundary by Sehwag. Could sense a crazy steel in the guy and he was frighteningly monotonous in scoring those runs.So much so, his average went up by almost three-quarters-of-a-run due to this one innings alone! Remember he has played more than 200 innings...(yes, yes, I am a number cruncher :-))

Then Kohli's bat speed. Not sure whether it was becaue of the ADSL connectivity from mio TV... but one thing was sure, Kohli's bat was a blur throughout. One moment the bowler turns his arm around. Then there is a whir of the bat and the ball was speeding towards the boundary. Class.

A good solid win by the Indians. But I shall wait for more sterner tests, where the Broads of the world will not bowl leg-side half-volleys or off-side full tosses.

A good start to the BQ part.

B Part:

Rambo has made a killing after the first game; but the tourney is in neo-natal stage. So...


Please send in your details for the next games asap.

Kenya vs New Zealand by 11:25 hours SGT Sunday
Sri Lanka vs Canada by 16:25 hours SGT Sunday

Q Part:

The first question of the BQ-CWC 2011 was answered by a number of people. Somebody said PB Sreenivas (nah!), Guru said Bhargav (though the junior is not 'yet' famous, in his own words) *$^#*!

The correct answer is Dr M G Ramachandran (from a photo shoot when he was 15, as he prepared an album to be sent around the studios so that he can land some acting jobs...Thanks Vikatan).

Chets, Maddy, Saran, Sharath, Siva* and Yuva got the right answer. Good start boys!

Now here is the next one.
Drumrolls pleazzzz...

An interesting googly from the world of tennis.

What is the connection between the two pictures - apart from the fact that they are two women tennis players?





Answers to the usual place.
Enjoy your Sunday.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Day 0: Confusion... Confusion...

With less than 24 hours to go for the tournament to start, the forms are leading to complete confusion.

                India spun into form against Australia and the hapless Kiwis.
                              Sri Lanka is in mid-season madness.
   Zimbabwe is struggling (but did you care!)
England is struggling - well, at least the Canadians gave them a scare and as I type this, are bundling the Pakis.
                                                              Australia in bad shape; so were they in 1999.
                   South Africa were brutal. But they have already ordered the 'Chokers' from Mumbai Zaveri Bazaar.
                                                                             Even the Oranje won a game against Kenya.

So, the old cliche has been dusted and is being bandied about:
"It is a very open tournament!" 
Yeah, Right!

...and that reflects in the sentence formatting as well :-)

And then there is the...

B Part:

Remember to send in the quarterfinals line up by tomorrow 3:55 pm SGT. One per group.
For your reference:

  • Group A: Australia, Pakistan, New Zealand, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe, Canada, Kenya
  • Group B: India, South Africa, England, West Indies, Bangladesh, Ireland, Netherlands

Also...
Remember to send in your entries for the BAN v IND game. Again by 3:55pm SGT.

For the margins and other details, please refer to the earlier post.

Q Part:

Now, for the first question of the BQ-CWC 2011.

Drumrolls pleazzzz...

An nice full toss down the legside... so help it along, folks!!

Who is this famous South-Indian personality?




Answers to the usual place.
Good luck and enjoy life.

PS: Thanks for those who replied back saying that the logo is nice.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

World Cup, Here We Come!!


Good luck for those watching the WC on television. After all you have to live with the four-ball over as dictated by the Programme Director. Hmmmm...
By the way, Mio TV has worked like magic so far.
Dilli bahooth door hai ;-) (The journey is long!)
Fingers crossed.

*************

The details of CWC 2011 BQ are here!

Rules are pretty much same as our past BQs. Still worth a while for you to go through.
Dabbu involved: 

Minimum 50 bucks

Please note that:
- Group A's Quarter-Final Line up (in the exact order as it would pan out within the group) will cost 3 bucks
- Group B's Quarter-Final Line up (in the exact order as it would pan out within the group) will cost 3 bucks

- Possible Semi-Final lineup costing 4 bucks
- Each preliminary game will cost 2 bucks
- Each Quarterfinal game will cost 3 bucks
- Each Semifinal game will cost 4 bucks
- And the final will cost 5 bucks

Ideally, I would think that you should participate in all the knock-out games; if that is the case, you have a chance of a total of 20 games in the tournament. A good enough number, I would think.

Mind you, the above is only a minimum requirement. You are free to go gaga on all the games :-))

Would appreciate if at least 10 get involved in the B-part; That kinda gives me the joy-quotient!!
* You are free to exceed this minimum by guessing the results of more games and more quarters line up guesses etc.
* But if you intend taking part part in the BQ, then you commit to the minimum set of numbers mentioned
above.

* Final winners give a commitment of donating at least 10% of their winnings towards charity. (I know, I know, all the winners from last time have donated it to charity - Project Give by SINDA - DONATED $255;;; Thanks to all of them! :-))

Framework:


0. Send in the quarter-finals line-up for each group. [in the exact order that you think that they will end up]

To be sent in by Noon SGT, Saturday 19th Feb 2011.

1. There are five things that you need to respond for each game:
Winning team (2 points), Winning Run Margin (4 points), Winning Wicket Margin (4 points), Max number of wickets by which team (2 points), Number of Sixers in the match (2 points)

** If you are reading this, then you are reading the fine-print. The winning margin points will accrue only if your winning team is correct; getting the margin right is just not enough. You have got to get the winning team AND the winning margin to get 6 points

2. Please send in all your entries at least 30 minutes before the game starts everyday to lnspatta@gmail.com
3. Please ensure that you give both the winning ranges: run-margin & wicket-margin
4. Please do not invent your own margins; stick to the published ranges shown below
5. If you are using Excel to track your guesses, when you cut-and-paste, please use Rich Text for pasting; the PCX format is painful from gmail.

Run Margin Ranges: (changed for games starting 22/2/2011)

Between 1 to 20  30 runs (both inclusive)
Between 21 to 40 runs 31 to 60 runs (both inclusive)
Between 41 to 60 runs 61 to 90 runs (both inclusive)
Above 61 runs 91 runs (61 91 and Infinity inclusive)

Wicket Margin Ranges:

By 1 to 3 wickets (both inclusive)
By 4 to 5 wickets (both inclusive)
By 6 to 8 wickets (both inclusive)
By 9 to 10 wickets (both inclusive)


Which team will take the most number of wickets in the match?

Either of the team names OR Same

Number of Sixers in the MATCH:

0-3 (both inclusive)
4-7 (both inclusive)

8-11 (both inclusive)
12++

Oh, don't worry, the Semis line up can be sent by March 7th 4pm SGT.
***Next update on Friday 18th Feb 2011 with the first Q of BQ-CWC2011. 
***Three Book Prizes for the top-Three quizzers sponsored by BQ Master*** (And the past winners will also be  feted!)
And the BQ Master's Decision is final - Ha Ha Ha !@!@!

Saturday, February 12, 2011

WC11 BQ is on!!


The Cricket World Cup 2011 is on us in less than a week!

Our own BQ will also be on in less than a week - whether you like it or not :-))

This time, the Q portion will be only based on pictures or videos, so that googling becomes a bit more irrelevant ;-)

More about the B portion later.

Before starting, a few admin details to be sorted out:

1. Do not forget your daily SPAM: Please let me know if you are really interested to be in the mailing list. Warning: Thou shall be spammed daily until the first week of April almost on a daily basis.
2. HTTP 404: If you are still interested, please check whether you need the SPAM to hit an alternate email address rather than the one that it is aimed at, now. If alternate, please let me know immediately, so that I can update the group accordingly.
3. Friendship is constant..If you have other friends who will be interested in this exercise, pls to introduce and we shall take it on from there.

Next Email: Will be on 16th Feb Wednesday giving you further details.

Enjoy the 'Mandala of Cricket'!!

PS: Those of you who did literature might know who said the quote on #3 above; of course you can come back with the answer - and while you are googling, check the second line of the quote - real gem!!!

Friday, December 31, 2010

*** Happy New Year - MMXI ***




2010 was quite a good year of learning.

It was the year when one learnt that...
  • driving the black car is easy (yes! got one at last!)
  • singing a new National Anthem is tough (Pink Card now!)
  • slaying the PSLE demon finally is possible (Not me! Still, what a relief!)
  • Wiki stands for 'What I Know Is' but yet does not know why Assange had to do the voyeuristic bit for History!
  • to pronounce Eyjafjallajökull is akin to putting your tongue through the wringer (what is the population of Iceland again? I have a vague suspicion that the Icelanders provoked the said-volcano to spew ash so that they can divert the world's attention away from their economic woes!)
  • QE2 is not the luxury liner, but a luxurious credit line for the banks to ease people quantitatively (:-|)
  • Dabaang is a very good movie (Plzzzzz!)
  • while one can opt-out of the casinos in Singapore, it may not be possible to do so when visiting shady sites!
  • Singapore pays its students just for attending Secondary school and beyond
  • work increases ten-fold when the project slows down and
  • the Spanish were deaf to Vuvuzela!

Ole 2010!!

Welcome 2011!!

Please plant and tend a tree in this Year of Forests!!

Have a Healthy, Happy and Prosperous New Year!!!

For the Tamil aficionados, here are the greetings!

Friday, December 24, 2010

Manmathan Ambu: Emperor's Clothes :-{}

For a Tamil review, visit here.

In the GE world, Jack Welch introduced the culling of bottom 10% every year. The euphemistic management expression for this was that the 'bar was being raised every year'. The same goes with Kamal's movies as well. If you proclaim to make good movies and to give better film experiences to the Tamil philistines that we are, then the bar is pegged higher all the time.

In the last decade, every movie that Kamal has scripted - with the exception of Hey Ram! and to a certain extent Anbe Sivam, has been a damp squib. In corporate parlance, we call it OCUD - Over Commit; Under Deliver!

Don't get me wrong! I like Kamal's cerebral approach to movies. I really enjoy it. Even his combo with Crazy used to be highly enjoyable intellectually. But when Kamal takes the pen and starts writing, his thoughts over-flow and ends up flooding people's senses. B said this about dialogue writing: If a hand-written piece of dialogue is more than three lines, then you have lost your audience. Very true! (but then, you don't need the mono-syllable offerings by Mani Ratnam as well!)

In Manmathan Ambu, Kamal attempts to put in a lot of intelligence into the dialogues through the various protagonists: A case in point is when Trisha compares the connecting door in her caravan to the zipper in your trousers or the hook in the blouse - it is there just to ensure that we are not exhibiting anything. Believe me, typing this much, I got tired. How will it be, for someone to hear that on the screen? By the time the first five words are done, the audience starts yawning...

Oh, by the way, the movie is not based on Hitch. Apologies for leading you down the garden path; well the Singapore newspapers were led down the garden path actually. Reminds me of one of B's all-time cracker a few years ago: The only truth in the newspapers are the obituaries!

In reality it is very loosely based on 'Romance on the High Seas'. A very old movie, I believe (Thanks Guru for pointing that out!).

For about 2.5 hours the movie was like a gentle breeze across the meadows on a steamy afternoon. Cool and refreshing. Slow, it was; but the different milieu - film stars, European divorcee, private detective etc, pithy dialogues, subdued and natural performance from the various characters made it a joy especially after the sound and fury of Endhiran.

And then just when you thought that you are going to get a straight-from-the-heart movie, Kamal gets cold feet and drags the movie to his tried-and-tested slap-stick comedy route. In Delhi they used to call it as KLPD. I will not expand that. This is a family site, after all.

If Mynaa (Udhay bought that movie after all; net net, he might make more on that movie than this!), proves that good stories/treatment can run irrespective of the stars and commercial pressures, then when are the jambavans of Tamil cinema such as Kamal going to push the 'envelope'?

No half measures such as 'faulty live recording', 'grainy digital video recording'...please!

One good piece in this movie was the song Neela Vaanam which shows Kamal's married life in reverse a la  Return to Innocence by Enigma.

Manmathan Ambu is good in very few parts. Otherwise it is disappointing. It is almost as if that Kamal is the Emperor who has no clothes and no one has the courage to tell him that his scripting needs finishing. Probably he needs the little kid from the movie to tell him the truth in the real life as well :-|||

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Await

...another 16 hours for the review of the much-awaited movie of the year (tongue firmly in cheek!)...
Copied or not, we have to pay the thandal...

Friday, December 03, 2010

Manmathan Ambu (Story Outline)




For those of you who were cribbing about the tamil post on this topic, here we go...

Dr Mannar is the 'date doctor' who helps Maddy (mostly called as Madhan) to 'phatao' movie star Trisha. In the mean time, love happens and no body knows who is loving who as the movie is likely to travel in the high seas in the cruise liner across Europe.

Why Europe? Why not in Singapore? It can be cheaper you know?

These were Kamal's words to producer Udhay (heir to billions in Tamil Nadu) and U reportedly said that the movie has to have a rich feeling - and the result? Thou shall watch Europe in a real rich vein...

Oh, by the way, if the outline reminds you of the movie 'Hitch', then it is not my problem. Neither is it Kamal's problem. It is only the viewer's problem.

After all, this is what Mishkin said after being accused of lifting from 'Kikujiro' for his masterpiece Nandalala: "Watch my movie as a stand-alone. Don't compare it with anything else, even if it were lifted off Kikujiro." I can salute Mishkin for one thing - at least, he is trying to bring in a classic to Tamil and introduce good cinema to the mind-less masses, but what about Kamal? Remakes of Hollywood commercial trashes... Sigh!

A miracle that refused, refuses, probably will refuse (?) to happen...

PS: That last line is from Charu.

Source: Singapore newspapers who covered the audio release also had a very brief outline with some masala from yours truly...

Sunday, October 03, 2010

Endhiran: Seeing is Believing!


For a general time-pass in Tamil on Endhiran you may want to go here. Now read on for the review in English...

I was telling this joke to Aishu this morning.

There were these two bearded gentlemen – one a proud Maratha and the other a gallant Sikh, travelling by train from Mumbai to Delhi. The compartment was empty and they got bored and decided to play a game. Each one would name an Indian Freedom fighter from their native land and will get to pull a hair out of the other one’s beard. Within minutes, it was apparent that the Sardarji was going to lose all his hair as the Marathi was reeling off the Tilaks and Gokhales as if there was no tomorrow. But then Sardarjis are nothing if not shrewd; in one brilliant move, the Sikh shouted, “Jallianwala Bagh!!” and pulled the entire beard off the Marathi’s face!!!

All ye Rajini detractors: Please do not play the above game with the Rajini fans hereafter. Before even you can start listing the Nayagans and the Gunas and the Anbe Sivams, you will hear a big shout – ‘Endhiran!’ and that is it; you are sure to lose, not just the facial hair… ok, this is a family site!

One went to Rex Cinemas in Singapore on Gandhi Jayanthi afternoon to watch Thalivar’s latest offering.

Full tummy? Tick.
Sleepy? Tick.
Pounding head-ache? Tick.
Heavy heart? Tick. (Why? Could not watch the movie 44 hours earlier :-()

As one entered the theatre, B was quite unhappy to see (a) a number of empty seats and (b) a number of families amongst the audience. What? 2nd day Rajini movie – empty seats? No buzz…Hayyooo :-((

Anyway, one decided to wait for the movie to start and start it did at 4pm.

The pace, the novelty, the relentless set-pieces, dashing visuals, intelligent dialogues and above all Rajini’s histrionics - it was like watching the first-ever ODI double century early this year by that Rajini of the cricket field, Sachin!

The next thing one knew was that the movie had ended! (I vaguely remember getting the pop-corn during the intermission – must have been vision-bleached!)

The story, as you would have read in all reviews is quite straight-forward.

Man creates Robot. Robot obeys Man – to the dot that is until Man gives feelings to Robot. Robot begins to go after Man’s lover. Man kills Robot. Robot comes back and creates havoc. Man worms, de-magnetizes, magnetizes and finally destructs Robot. 

There is a very poignant end to the movie which is bound to make you come out of the hall with questions about relationships!

One hears that Sujatha had pretty much done the story and dialogue at least ten years ago. Remember his Jeeno story series (two of them)? Still quite fresh!  Also heard that Shankar had to employ an army of 250 people to kinda update the whole piece to make it a bit more contemporary (1 TerraHertz, 1 Zettabyte etc.) Hmmm… what was Sujatha’s IQ again?

Rajini completely rules the roost. It is hard to imagine how Kamal would have fared in this role based on the initial casting. Neither would Shah Rukh have cut it. Rajini is the suave Dr Vaseegaran de Man and the Robot who himself has multiple incarnations - innocent(?) Chitti, love-smitten Chitti, scheming Chitti, menacing Chitti and the wise Chitti.

Prosthetics or not, he looks dashing and as usual, steals the thunder when he turns the villain in the second-half.

Yes, he does not spew out any one-liners; in fact Ash even makes fun of his ‘thanee vazhi’ dialogue. Rajini’s parents exactly have 90 seconds of screen-time. So do others – in fact that mosquito ‘Rangooski’, Sujatha’s nick-name, occupies more celluloid real-estate than Karunas, Santhanam, Haneefa and Kalabhavan Mani all put together!  But one never notices these things. In the larger scheme of things, Rajini rules and that is all that matters!

Ash manages to hold onto the fast ride without much of a problem. She is definitely the most beautiful 35-year old in the world. No tongue-in-cheek there!

Yes, there are six songs including the mandatory adrenaline-pumper before the climax. Machu-Pichu is breath-taking and so is Ash in that song ;-) By the way, where was the Kadhal Anukkal song picturized? Dead Sea or one of those deserts in South America?

The movie is heavy on human relationships with quite an interesting characterization throughout.

Dr Vaseegaran does not reciprocate the ‘right feelings’ towards a beauty like Ash (aaarghh! blind or what?), Sana cheats and lies in the exam hall, the two side-kick scientists double-cross, Dr Bohra covets and pollutes Chitti… and all these are more than enough for an intelligent robot like Chitti to absorb and he ends up spewing love poetry on Sana!! Natural? You bet. Everybody seems to be doing the right thing at that moment without realizing how it is impacting the new-born robot.

The movie is heavy on technology. The jargons will not kill you. If you don’t understand them, fret not. Apart from missing a few insider jokes about IP Address, Nickel bolts etc., they are just there to give you a Sci-Fi feeling. The CGI is mind-blowing, on par, and at times better than other Hollywood movies. Remember the CGI was done by various Hollywood organizations and the proof-of-the-pudding could be seen at the end of the movie: for a full three minutes, the names of the people who did CGI, from India to US to China to India, just kept rolling on and on.

As a director Shankar has excelled himself this time around. While he could easily have made this into a mindless action flick (and still raked in the moolah!), one can see that he has struggled hard to get a complex script to the screen and has greatly succeeded in doing so. Hats off, mate!
Sivaji was a Rajini movie directed by Shankar.
Endhiran is a Shankar movie with Rajini acting in it.
Which director has done that with Rajini in the last two decades at least?
What do I hear? Chandramukhi? I cringe.

Leaving thoughts:

With or without Carpet Bombing Strategy, everybody associated with making Endhiran will become richer.

B was not too satisfied in the end. He mentioned something pertinent. Usually in a Rajini movie, people come to watch a human being do the extra-ordinary and they probably see themselves doing those acts. In Endhiran, Rajini does more fantastic things than they could ever have imagined – but it is not real you see: a man doing super-man stuff and a super-man doing super-man stuff has differences, right? I think that is what made him say, “I hope that this movie runs well, so that Rajini can come back for a Baasha-2!”

As far as I am concerned…

Forget all that psycho-analysis baloney.

Go watch Endhiran.

Twice.

Dot.

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Nut Crackers #3: Locksmiths!


If you have employed these species for their esoteric services, you would have realized that even the most un-yielding locks would open up like 7-11 at their hands, with one of those small pin like contraption. On top of it, invariably, the lock would have to be replaced. And worse still, one’s purse also lightens up so fast that you literally want to starve for a week to save up the money. What to do?

But this locksmith who came home last week, proved to be a good-fun guy. After the customary 10-second trick, he went on to regale the females of the household with a few funny locked-out anecdotes.

One of which was a cracker:

Apparently, there was an altercation between a husband and wife. The Young and Feisty wife, seeing that she was not winning the argument stormed out of the room. Disturbed because of the rarity of the event – the husband winning the argument over wife, that is – she banged the door close on her way out, leaving the husband to gloat secretly on his success.

Fifteen minutes later, mollified, she knocked the door calling out the husband for a quick dinner at the nearby hawker centre. Chicken rice to the soul, perhaps.

Unfortunately, the husband would not open the door and to add insult to injury, he even claimed that he could not open the door as the door was stuck!

Remember the wife being Y & F? She renewed the hostilities with the poor sod through the wooden door. But no, the hubby could not open the door. How impertinent of him?

The Y & F called the – no, not the locksmith but, the police claiming that the hubby was harassing her mentally by not opening the door. The blues came up and after a number of threats to the hubby…

“You will be put in jail!” (Where do you think I am now?)
“You will lose your house!” (First get me out of the room!)
“You will be divorced from your wedlock!” (Open this stupid lock, please!)

…they realized that he was possibly speaking the truth. Our dear locksmith was summoned as an expert and witness and after the usual sleight of hand, the hubby and wife reunited – and they are living happily everafter, probably.

PS: Locksmith mentioned that he gets more business if the couples are young or if the flat is on a high-floor or if the month is December. See the connection: Doors slam when it is quite windy!

******
Didn't I say that writing in 100 words is quite tough. In just the third attempt, the word count went four times higher! Try, I shall...

Nut Crackers #2: EQ & Eugenics

With a 17-year old in the house, girls and dating can’t be far off from any discussion. B narrated this about a friend’s predicament in his class.


B’s friend M is a top-notch academics guy. Class first; world debating champion; no position is difficult for him to defend blah, blah, blah. And he wants to go to Oxford or Cambridge, with scholarship. Naturally. With this in the background, read on.

M: Hey B! What do you think about xyz? Can I approach her for a date?

B: Why this sudden interest in xyz, M?

M: No la! All these stupid scholarship boards not only look at IQ, they want to see your EQ as well! And I want to shore it up, you see!

B: Oh ok. She is fine and you can be a socialist with xyz. (Lingo for being less-volatile and steady)

M: (suddenly remembering something) Hey! Is she applying for Oxbridge?

B: (thinks for a nano-second) No. Why?

M: Aiyah! That is not good. She should be Oxbridge material, man!

B: Look here. What is important? EQ or Eugenics? If you want your love life to be driven by Eugenics then you need to forget not only xyz but a to w as well!!

M: (in a resigned tone) OK la! For now EQ wins….

PS: Boys will be boys. M apparently is so-smitten by xyz that he is sure of his EQ touching 150+ :-)

Nut Crackers #1: F1 Road Closure


No, this is not an attempt to sell any kitchen appliances or torture instruments - not much of a difference between the two though. Just an honest attempt to write in around 100 words about something that cracked us up. Very tough!

*******

As I was sleepily guiding the black behemoth yesterday morning towards the daughter’s school, there was this radio news item that caught our attention. “Singapore would experience low road closures this year during the F1 race!”

That set the tone for the next 300 seconds (that is the time that it takes for me to drive about 600 metres to the school!).

D somehow heard it as ‘Singapore would experience NO road closures this year during the F1 race!” (Happens if you hear it in the vernacular and you are sufficiently sleep-deprived) and her next comment really cracked it:

“So these drivers have to worry less about the speeds and bends but more about the traffic lights!”

Friday, July 23, 2010

Taxi... Taxi...

Tomes have been written about the woes of taxi-using public in Singapore. But this one really takes the cake.

Yesterday, after an exhilarating and an inebriating evening at Clarke Quay, RR leaves the restaurant to go back home as soon as possible.

He gets into a cab; says "Punggol" and promptly dozes off.

After about 10 minutes, through the alcohol-hazed eyes looks out for familiar spots.

You know the drill - when you are sleeping in the vehicle (not while driving, that is!) the GPS inside the brain always runs and tells your mind that you should have reached Toa Payoh, Ang Mo Kio etc etc.

Now what did RR see... Clementi!! But before he could protest, he was already seeing Jurong. After all the expressways are meant to be clipped at at 90 kmph, aren't they?

Two things:
1. For those of you who are not geographically challenged, in Singapore to go to Punggol from Clarke Quay one kind of goes North-East; but what RR saw were all in South-South-West direction.
2. Yes, there was booze in the party. But it definitely did not explain the change of sign-boards!!

With great concern, RR asks the cab driver, "Are we going to Punggol?" (Communication Lesson 101: Clarify and Confirm); to which the cabbie vigourously replies "Yes!"

Having c&c -ed, RR goes about correcting the course (no pun intended) of the driver's action. When he told him about the 'slight' directional anomaly of the driver's navigational abilities, the cabbie got thoroughly nervous. By the time all this happened, they had already reached Boon Lay - if you go Wester, you end up in the sea ;-)

After what seemed like a million turns and u-turns, the course was corrected and RR returned home.

Here is the receipt as a proof. By far, this is the longest distance (& highest fare) that I have ever seen on a taxi bill in Singapore. I believe that the poor driver was so apologetic that he took only $15 from RR which is par for the course.



And just to give you an idea of the route...



So, next time I sit in the passenger seat, acting as the navigator for the wife, I will remind myself of the day when RR went to Boon Lay to reach Punggol!!!

PS: One thing I do NOT want to see is Comfort penalizing the poor driver for this!

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Not Espana - but En Pasa!

Reams and reams have been written about the passing ability of the Spaniards.

Nothing captures that spirit than the 12th and 13th seconds of the video in the link below. It just comes so naturally !!!




Forget Puyol's bare torso!!

Ole, Ole, Kamama!!

P.S. Police were called yesterday in the apartment block next to mine. For what? Nice residents complained that there was too much noise and disturbance as some children were kicking a soccer ball around!!! How do you expect the talent to grow? People in Singapore good only for criticizing their sportspersons from the comfort of their arm-chairs & of course, to go and bet whereever there is a better odd! Aaaargh!

Monday, May 17, 2010

Le Figaro!

After all that...



This brings us to the end of a very good cricketing season which started with the CCT09, coasted through IPL3 and then limped to a final halt in WCT20.

It was great fun.

There were 12 questions in CCT09, 25 in IPL3 and 7 in WCT20.

And the various winners are:

...drumrolls please...

CCT09: Yadavalli (1st) Amar, Anand Re & Bob (2nd)
IPL3: Siva* (1st) Guru (2nd)
WCT20: Siva* (1st) Anand Re & Ishan (2nd)

Congratulations folks!



After the IPL3, the charity counter is at $147.03. And from WCT20-BQ, Laks (thanks!) has already committed his winnings to charity. Just to recollect, we donated $100 to Singapore Red Cross after CCT09!

And here is the copy of the receipt of the amount that was donated to Project Give of SINDA. (updated on 5/4/11)





Settlement instructions via email.


Thanks and keep up the good work!

Be good and stay healthy!

Inger-Lund, Inger-Lund, Inger-Lund!


No, I have not joined the England soccer patriots! It is just that they played such wonderful cricket over the last two weeks that before you could sing the title, the opponents were blown away. In reality, the only tough game they had was against the Windies. 60 off 6, in retrospect especially after that Hussey Hurricane, is a walk in the park, these days.

Having said that, KP has proved to be a one in a million, what with the new family arrival and all that.

Yes, you can find fault with Collingwood persisting with Yardy for that one additional over or Kieswetter's(what a name!) ugly swipe at Johnson when he wanted to go home in a hurry... but in a first world level victory over the last 35 years, there is no one to blame.

It was funny that Michael Clarke came in at No.3; I almost thought that he was having an alphabetical lineup but then Watson and Warner do not precede Clarke, right? Anyways, Clarke himself has accepted that he is no good in T20. Wish other super stars are hearing that.

Collingwood led from the front and that superb split-second timing catch to dismiss his counterpart was pure magic :-))

Enjoy, dear Pommies! It was a well deserved victory and the English bull-dog spirit was in exhibition aplenty.

That brings us to the end of WCT20 - BQ series.

Oh, forgot!

The answer to the last question is.... wait a minute. I seem to have inadvertently given the answers in the write-up above. Find them out!

Siva*, Rambo and Ganesh Kumar got all five of them correct. There were a few 4.5s and a 4 as well.



Overall, Siva* got all right in this edition - 11 points. Congratulations.

Anand Re and Ishan are the runners up with 9.5 points.

All three of them get a prize.

Other admin details to follow via email.

Thanks for keeping me on the toes. Off to some rest.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

SALUTE Mr Cricket!!!


Legend has it that John Wright, that gem of a coach, took the Indians on a movie night to watch 'Remember The Titans' ahead of that greatest of test series in 2000 against Australia. Apparently, the movie kindled the Indians so much that they pulled not one, but two rabbits out of their hats in Kolkata and Chennai.

Move over, 'Remember The Titans'!

Enter 'Hussey's Hurricane at St Lucia'!!

There is no better way to exemplify the spirit of Australians on the sporting arena than to exhibit this innings again and again to all those under-achievers!

See the sequence of RRR: 80 off 6, 70 off 5; 56 off 4; 48 off 3; 34 off 2 and 18 off 1.

I cannot imagine any team other than Australia to have achieved this. The only other team that would not have thrown in the towel under such circumstances was actually bowling :-))

It was sad that Pakistan could not make it. Over the last two years, these are guys who have played less cricket than your average club cricketer from Singapore. You have people being banned for life, years; you have your economy on the brink; your country has pressure from all sides; yet, they not only survived the chaos, but they seem to have thrived in the chaos to reach the semis yet again & miss the finals by the proverbial cat's whisker!

One was ecstatic to have watched such a beaut of a game; Ended up waking people up to blurt the result out - only to be met with 'Oh, ok. Gotta sleep. Don't disturb!'. BKJAKS (Bandar kya jaane adrath ki swaad?)


Read this gem from cricinfo and it just about sums up the whole spirit behind.

"Australianism," wrote Arlott 62 years ago, "means single-minded determination to win - to win within the laws but, if necessary, to the last limit within them. It means where the 'impossible' is within the realm of what the human body can do, there are Australians who believe that they can do it - and who have succeeded often enough to make us wonder if anything is impossible to them. It means they have never lost a match - particularly a Test match - until the last run is scored or their last wicket down."

Paraphrasing, "You do not say -'We will play Sri Lanka on Tuesday and take it as a consolation win before we go home."

MSD - You need some rest, mate!

Leaving BQ-7 open for one more day to enable those who missed out answering yesterday. Remember the last question carries 5 points.

Siva* (11), Ishan (9.5) and Ganesh Kumar (9) are the top-three including BQ-7.

Remember to send in your Finals guesses for a cracker of a game between the Pommies and Ozzies!!

Ciao.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Where is the party?


First signs of MSD's unravelling. Everybody and his uncle are taking potshots at the Indian team.
Rightly so. But for the wrong reasons.

Long and short is that India will never win anything of worth in T20. The reason is quite simple:

The moment they see India, oppositions are going to do two things:

(1) pack their teams with fast bowlers and give 'em the perfume ball as a staple diet
(2) where possible, give them the liveliest of pitches.

Since it is only four overs that they have to worry about, it is almost impossible to see India crossing 160 consistently. Lesser said about the Indian bowling the better.

MSD and Kumble made pertinent points about the pressures of playing for the franchises - we have seen that happen in soccer; only there the itineraries are much saner and definitely the franchisees do not want their wards to attend/adorn 'must-attend' parties!!

England did a fabulous job at St Lucia thrashing Sri Lanka; it will be a good thing to watch them face off against Australia - two good bowling teams with England holding a slight edge of that 'x' factor.

Answer to BQ-6:

Answer is 98,0,1,0,1.
For the explanations check here.

Anand Re, Siva*, Ganesh Kumar, Ishan (Honest: did this in his econs class at the varsity) gave the right answer.

Here is the last one for this tournament: BQ-7:

A bumper one to round this edition off. There are five boxes given below. Each one contains a puzzle. Each puzzle refers to a common expression that we are all familiar with. Your task is simple. Give me the five expressions that these puzzles refer to. There is no connection between the puzzles.



Send in your entries for:

1. Aus v Pak semis#2 - ALL CAN JOIN - No restrictions! Same rules apply.
2. Finals - ALL CAN JOIN - No restrictions! Same rules apply.
3. Answers to the final quiz question

See you soon.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

A repeat of last year, perhaps?


LoA has to catch up on Australia at some stage; may be the semis! And they were able to leave out Doug Bollinger :-|
England is pretty hot with Yardy doing the hard yards and Swann swooning people around. KP, the new dad is likely to come and play with gay abandon.

India has a new captain. Suresh Raina. Ha Ha Ha!

Suddenly all and sundry seem have remembered Shakespeare: 

"Is this a dagger I see before me? 
The handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee!"

Yeah, Dhoni's blue eyes are turning paler slowly.

Answer to BQ-5:

It is not such a devilish problem to NOT give 666 as the answer. Indeed it is the answer. Go figure!

Again a very good response. Anand Re, Bob, Ganesh Kumar, Guru, Letchu (welcome!), Maanasa, Rambo, Shiv and Siva* got it right.  Siva* has answered all the questions and Anand Re, Guru and Ishan are lagging behind by one. 

Let us see if the following cracker - Thanks to Bob, will separate the boys from men.

BQ-6:

A bit long. But quite good, I have to say. Remember the Shooting problem from IPL and its answer? This one goes somewhere along those lines...

There are 5 pirates on a ship, in descending order of seniority, as follows:

Jack (seniormost pirate, Captain)
John (2nd-seniormost)
Jules (3rd-seniormost)
Jim (4th-seniormost)
Joe (juniormost)

They loot a ship and come in possession of a chest with exactly 100 gold coins in it. As the Captain of the ship, Jack has to decide how the 100 gold coins get distributed amongst the 5 of them, without consulting anyone else. Once he announces his distribution decision, all 5 of them (including himself) will vote for/against his decision.

If Jack gets > = 50% of the votes, then his decision stands valid and he remains Captain with honour.
If Jack gets < 50% of the votes, then he is deemded unfit to remain Captain, is beheaded and thrown to the sharks. In that case, John (2nd-seniormost) becomes Captain, and then John has to decide the distribution. John's decision would then be subject to the same voting rule and conditions. If John fails and is killed, Jules becomes the Captain and so on.

Everyone is aware of these rules.

The question is - What should Jack's distribution be, such that:

1) Jack gets the maximum no. of gold coins possible for himself, and
2) Jack remains alive (and thus remains Captain)

There is only one number possible as his maximum limit.

Enjoy your Thursday & send in your entries for the semi#1 + the quiz.